Honda City AT VS Ford Fiesta AT


Honda city AT and Ford Fiesta AT interior
Not too long ago, automatics were rather unpopular on any car this side of a Skoda Laura. The general perception of them being more expensive than their manual cousins & less fuel efficient didn’t sit too well with buyers in such a price sensitive segment. Old school autos also ate into big chunks of the engine’s power & were about as much fun to drive as a bar of soap.







Things have changed though – our increasingly crowded streets & gridlocks mean that we spend more time changing gears than actually driving.

Funky dashboard complements the sporty exteriors of the Fiesta. Plastic quality is inconsistent though
Also, the modern automatic gearbox has come a long way from the slushboxes of old. Take for example Ford’s new Fiesta – it’s being offered with a twin clutch automatic – a thoroughly up to date gearbox. Ford believes it is more fuel efficient, shifts gears more smoothly & gives you more driving pleasure.

But we simply can’t take Ford’s word, can we? That’s why you see the Honda City auto here. It’s been the de facto choice in this segment since its launch in 2009 & stiff competition from Volkswagen & Hyundai didn’t ruffle its feathers either. The City has a conventional torque converter & has only five gears against the Ford’s six. The City is also just Rs 4000 more than the Fiesta’s Rs 9.7 lakh price tag.

Design & engineering

City's high driving position like most hondas is spot-on.
Visually you will find no difference between the manual & automatic Fiestas – you get the same swept back headlamps, distinctive grille & bold creases that add up to a sporty shape. The tail section looks too high in profile though & is a bit ungainly. The Fiesta’s biggest brag is its dual clutch transmission, a first in this segment. After the recent facelift, the City got some minor cosmetic changes. The front grille now gets a chrome finish; there’s a new rear bumper & different taillights as well.




Interiors

Fiesta has a 6-speed dual-clutch gearbox.
The Fiesta’s dashboard is nicely textured with soft touch materials but some plastics lower down look shiny & cheap; some of the switchgear too doesn’t feel premium either. What lets the interiors down is the rear seat, which simply can’t match the City for legroom. Headroom too is not as generous & the small rear windows add to the cooped up feeling. The Fiesta’s driving position is superb, the steering wheel, gearlever & seat are perfectly placed & the pedals are well spaced.

The City’s front seats are good, but not as nice as the Fiesta’s. Sure, there’s lots of space & the front seat cushions are generous, but the driving position isn’t anywhere as snug as the Ford’s. Where it does score over the Ford though is by having slightly better rearward visibility, & the rear seats are decidedly better. There is a generous amount of width & legroom & you feel less hemmed in here. The City now comes with light brown fabrics as opposed to the beige you used to get in the earlier car. The dials now get a cool blue backlighting & the chrome rings on the AC controls look nice.

The Fiesta is the better equipped car & has some unique features. There’s voice activation for the audio system, Bluetooth connectivity, climate control & auto folding mirrors, so it’s amazing that Ford has priced it at par with the lesser equipped City.

Engine, gearbox & performance

Honda City uses a conventional 5-speed auto
So how does the Fiesta’s hi tech gearbox perform in the real world driving conditions? Slot the gearlever in ‘D’ & you will find the Fiesta jumps off the line with enthusiasm. The dual clutch box feels good in traffic & you find it does a good job of selecting the right gear for the right situation. The gear ratios are shorter than the City’s & this helps with quick responses in the cut & thrust of city traffic. There is none of that gearshift jerkiness usually associated with twin clutch units. For ambling along in traffic, the Fiesta is brilliant & smoother than the City. The trouble is, as soon as traffic thins out, the Fiesta struggles a bit. This is mainly down to the engine’s lack of grunt – most of the power made by the Ford engine is near its redline so you really need to rev it to get the best out of it. The mid range is a bit flat as well & lacks punch.

The City’s torque converter transmission is not as smooth & power delivery can be abrupt at times. This makes it slightly tricky to drive smoothly in stop start traffic. If you do drive on the highway though, it’s the City that has the clear advantage. This is mainly down to the strong 118bhp engine & the quick shifting five speed auto. The City’s motor is free revving too. Our VBOX figures reflect this. The Fiesta takes 13.80sec to reach 100kph which makes it a second slower than the City. Even in gear, the City proves to be much quicker than the Fiesta.

The City’s engine/gearbox combo is more fun to use & in manual mode, the gearbox holds on to a gear & doesn’t upshift unless you pull the paddle (the Fiesta doesn’t have paddle shifters). The Fiesta doesn’t come with a manual mode; instead you get an ‘L’ mode which gives you more engine braking & the ’box stays in the lowest gear possible.

Ride & handling

If Honda is famous for its engines, Ford is equally well known for its driving dynamics. & the Fiesta, fine tuned to Indian tastes, is no different. Now, keen to appeal to a wider customer base, the car has been tuned to erase every bump & broken patch Indian roads can throw at it. & the taller springs & tuned dampers deliver the desired effect. The ride quality over poor sections of the road is simply superb. The Fiesta blots out most road noise over poor sections & the car never feels floaty at high speeds.

The City feels distinctly second best on the ride & handling front. The same section of road seems worse for wear, every poorly paved patch on the road gets highlighted & this is especially true at low speeds. The suspension is also much more audible than the Ford’s. But once speeds build, the City manages to tackle poor sections with less noise filtering through to the cabin. The City also feels the more nimble of the two. While its light steering fails to inspire confidence & feels vague at speed, it’s a delight in urban traffic. The steering of the Fiesta is well weighted & considerably more direct.

Fuel efficiency

Ford claims the Fiesta automatic to be very fuel efficient & our test confirms this. In town, the Fiesta returned a impressive 10.3kpl as against the City’s 9.5kpl, while on the highway the Honda’s tall gearing means it returned slightly better figures than the Ford.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great, I prefer the first one, because Honda City is always my first choice.

Mori said...

Honda City is really my favorite model, much better than similar cars

Post a Comment

Copyright © car to ride. All Rights Reserved.
Blogger Template designed by Click Bank Engine.